Skip to main content

"I'm Throwing you (ID) Pearls Here" by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.

Prior to me employed by a non-academic teaching hospital I spent 11 years teaching Infectious Disease to medical students, Internal Medicine residents and ID fellows at 3 different academic teaching hospitals. I had a vast array of clinical pearls that I would share on teaching rounds. In my last 5 years in a non-teaching setting I am often amazed that no one ever taught physicians who are Board Certified in Internal Medicine these important teaching points. I thought it might be useful to share some of my favorite ID teaching points or "pearls" in this blog.


1) oral Beta lactam agents are not adequate treatment of bacteremia

2) Beta-lactam- beta lactamase drugs (Unasyn, Zosyn) and Carbapenems (Ertapenem and Meropenem) have perfectly adequate anaerobic coverage and do not require the addition of Metronidazole

3) Oral vancomycin has no bioavailability

4) Vancomycin is inferior to Beta lactam drugs for the treatment of serious MSSA infections

5) When awaiting sensitivities of a serious Staph aureus infection give Vancomycin and Cefazolin and then drop one agent when the sensitivities are known

6) In patients with a significant Penicillin allergy who need empiric therapy for Gram negative infections Aztreonam, a monobactam, is a good choice

7) For patients with active C diff colitis who need coverage for a concomitant intra-abdominal infection consider using Tigecycline which actually has activity against C diff

8) For patients with Severe Babesiosis I give triple therapy with Clindamycin, Azithromycin and Atovaquone as Clindamycin has the most rapid killing based upon time-kill curves

9) A patient is unlikely to have Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis with normal transaminases

10) A patient is unlikely to have Babesiosis with a normal LDH

11) The best target for MRSA killing is achieving a Vancomycin AUC:MIC ratio of at least 400. For an MRSA isolate with a VANCO MIC of 1, I arrive at an empiric dose by multiplying 400 X estimated Vancomycin clearance . Estimated Vancomycin clearance is calculated the following way:
Creatinine clearance X 0.79 + 15.4 X 0.06.

12) I do not use Vancomycin for MRSA infections where the Vancomycin MIC is 2 or greater

13) The key determinant to microbial killing by Beta- lactams and Carbapenems is time above the MIC. To maximize this I dose the following drugs as follows:
Zosyn 3.375gms IV q 8 hours with each dose administered over 4 hours
Cefepime 1 gm IV q 6 hours
Meropenem 500mg IV q 6 hours

14) If you considering a systemic infection with a Herpes family virus such as CMV or EBV, check a PT-INR and D-dimer as these viruses cause endothelial damage and a microvascular coagulopathy

15) If Staph aureus grows in a blood culture within 14 hours of the time it was collected (time to positivity < or =14 hours) then an endovascular infection is likely

16) For patients with pneumonia, order an MRSA screen of the nares and throat, if these are both negative and you do not have a sputum culture with MRSA you can stop Vancomycin

17) In patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers, if you can touch bone with a blunt forceps (probe to bone test) you have made the diagnosis of osteomyelitis and do not need to order an MRI

18) In Diabetic foot ulcers the following are highly suggestive of osteomyelitis: an ESR> 70, an ulcer depth > 3mm, and ulcer size > 2 cm squared

19) Eosinopenia - an absolute eosinophil count < 50 cells/mm3 is good marker of infection

20) In a patient with infection, an ANC:ALC ratio> 10 and/or an absolute lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/mm3 are suggestive of concomitant bacteremia

21) In patients with non-purulent cellulitis who have venous insufficiency, lymph node resection or irradiation or lymphedema think Group A Strep. If they are diabetic also consider Group B Strep

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"The Viral Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease: Time to put it to the test!" by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was estimated to affect 35.5 million people worldwide in 2010 and is expected to affect 115.4 million people by 2050. Approximately 10% of people over 65 are affected and 50% of population > 85 are affected. The currently approved drugs provide minimal benefit. The benefit of experimental drugs observed in Phase II clinical trials has been followed by resounding failures in adequately powered Phase III clinical trials. Even the results of the highly publicized Biogen study have significant questions associated with it. It is quite clear that a new strategy must be entertained and tested. Four members of the Human Herpes Virus family have been associated with development of Alzheimer’s disease; HSV-1, VZV, HHV-6A, and HHV-7. HSV-1 is capable in vitro leading to the production the Beta amyloid protein found in senile plaques and phosphorylating tau protein seen in neurofibrillary tangles seen in Alzheimer’s, a   phenomenon that can be blocked by co-incub

"Testing Strategies Against Lyme Persisters" by Steven LaRosa, MD

Recently I was contacted and interviewed by a party to get my feelings about the state of treatment of Lyme disease. On the phone we lamented about the sizable number of poor souls who continue to suffer symptoms after what is considered standard of care treatment. I made it clear to the interviewer that I practice only evidence-based medicine and that I treat patients based upon the IDSA guidelines. I also railed against physicians who treat patients with months of parenteral antibiotic therapy for “Chronic Limes’ Disease” (ha ha). I stated fairly aggressive and believe that such practices opens the patient to life threatening infections including catheter-related bacteremia and Clostridium difficile colitis. After I got off the phone I started to do some soul searching. I have gotten so used to saying the same lines over and over again, but when was the last time that I actually had looked at the literature? The answer obviously was way too long ago. I was able to identify 5 cli