Skip to main content

New Players in the treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP): Ceftaroline and Corticosteroids by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.



The treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has been for many years unchanged and boring. We give a macrolide to cover Legionella, Chlamydophila, and Mycoplasma and Ceftriaxone, a 3rd generation Cephalosporin, to cover the dreaded Pneumococcus and Haemophilus influenzae. Data from recent clinical trials would suggest a role for Ceftaroline and corticosteroids.

Ceftaroline
Ceftaroline, a “5th Generation Cephalosporin” has a similar spectrum of action as the CAP workhouse drug Ceftriaxone but also has activity against MRSA. There have now been 3 Phase III trials of Ceftaroline vs. Ceftriaxone in CAP patients with a moderate severity of illness as indicated by PORT scores III and IV. The primary efficacy variable was clinical response at days 8-15 in the modified intent to treat population (patients who were randomized and received some study drug). In a meta-analysis (Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71: 862–870), A superior clinical response was observed with Ceftaroline 600mg IV  q 12 hours 784/961 patients (81.5%) compared with Ceftriaxone 1-2gms/day 695/955 (74.7%); OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.34-2.06, p < 0.001. A statistically significant difference in treatment effect was also observed in patients with confirmed S. pneumoniae infections with a clinical response of 73/85 (85.9%) with Ceftaroline and 54/74 (73.0%). The difference in treatment effects has biologic plausibility. Ceftaroline has greater affinity for Penicillin Binding Protein 2 (PBP2) than Ceftriaxone. In patients with S.aureus and S. pneumoniae, the MIC was on average 16 fold lower for Ceftaroline than Ceftriaxone.

Corticosteroids
The efficacy of corticosteroids has been studied and debated for different infectious diseases for years. Guyatt and colleagues performed a meta-analysis of the efficacy of corticosteroids in CAP (Ann Intern Med. 2015; 163:519-528) in 1974 patients in 12 trials. The use of corticosteroids was associated with a 3% reduction in mortality, a 5% decrease in the need for mechanical ventilation and a 1% decrease in hospital length of stay. The treatment benefit of corticosteroids on mortality was confined to the 6 studies of patients with severe pneumonia; 10% mortality with corticosteroids vs. 22% in the control arm. A Swiss study (Lancet 2015; 385:1511-1518) was performed in 485 patients with CAP who were randomized to either prednisone 50mg/day x 7 days or placebo.  A total of 50% of patients had severe CAP as indicated by a PSI class of IV and V. A statistically significant shorter time to clinical stability of 1.4 days and shorter length of hospitalization by 1 day was observed. Torres and colleagues in a Spanish study (JAMA. 2015; 313(7):677-68) randomized 120 patients with severe CAP to either methylprednisolone (MP) 0.5mg/kg every 12 hours X 5 days or placebo. Severe CAP was defined as a PSI class of V and a CRP level of >150mg/L. A statistically significant reduction in treatment failure was observed; MP 13%, Placebo 31%, OR 0.34 (0.14-0.87). A non-significant 5% lower mortality was observed in the methylprednisolone group

Bottom Line
Ceftaroline was not available at the time of the 2007 IDSA/ATS Guidelines of the treatment of CAP and corticosteroid use is mentioned only in the context of treating concomitant adrenal insufficiency. An update of these guidelines is currently underway. The available data would indicate that Ceftaroline should take the place of Ceftriaxone in the treatment of CAP. Corticosteroids at a dose of methylprednisolone 0.5mg/kg IV q 12 hours x 5 days should be considered in patients with severe CAP. I personally like to stay away from scoring systems that are difficult to remember, but there clearly are phone apps that can determine a PSI class of at least IV. A CURB 65 score of at least 2 is easy to determine and could be used to determine severe CAP. For simplicity I would also consider any CAP patient in the ICU with a CRP of at least 150mg/L.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Testing Strategies Against Lyme Persisters" by Steven LaRosa, MD

Recently I was contacted and interviewed by a party to get my feelings about the state of treatment of Lyme disease. On the phone we lamented about the sizable number of poor souls who continue to suffer symptoms after what is considered standard of care treatment. I made it clear to the interviewer that I practice only evidence-based medicine and that I treat patients based upon the IDSA guidelines. I also railed against physicians who treat patients with months of parenteral antibiotic therapy for “Chronic Limes’ Disease” (ha ha). I stated fairly aggressive and believe that such practices opens the patient to life threatening infections including catheter-related bacteremia and Clostridium difficile colitis. After I got off the phone I started to do some soul searching. I have gotten so used to saying the same lines over and over again, but when was the last time that I actually had looked at the literature? The answer obviously was way too long ago. I was able to identify 5 cli...

Steven P. LaRosa, MD CV

  CURRICULUM VITAE Steven P. LaRosa, M.D. Address                       23 Junction Lane South Hamilton, MA 01982 Phone                          (401) 575-1812 Email                          slarosamd@gmail.com THERAPEUTIC AREAS Infectious Diseases Pulmonary/ Critical Care Coagulation Inflammation/Immunology Extracorporeal Devices RESEARCH EXPERIENCE Vice President, Clinical Development     Entasis Therapeutics, Mar 2020- present §   Medical lead- Phase III trial of Sulbactam-Durlobactam in Carbapem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections §   Safety Monitor- Phase III trial of Sulbactam-Durlo...