Skip to main content

"The Issue of CMV Reactivation in Serpositive Sepsis Patients: No to Prophylaxis" by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.




Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a member of the Herpesviridiae family and is endemic throughout the world. Approximately 60% of adults are seropositive for past CMV infection. Reactivation of CMV is a source of significant morbidity in immunocompromised hosts. CMV can cause direct organ injury, activate the coagulation cascade as well as act as an endogenous immunosuppressant leading to secondary bacterial, fungal and viral infections. In the immunocompetent critically ill ICU population, CMV viremia is found in approximately 30%  of CMV seropositive patients and is associated with a poor outcome. It is unclear if CMV leads to poor outcome or is a disease severity marker.

In the current issue of JAMA 2017; 318 (8): 731-740 Ajit Limaye and colleagues begin to address in the question. They performed a double-blind, placebo controlled trial in patients who had either sepsis or severe trauma and were seropositive for past CMV infection. A total of 160 patients were randomized to receive prophylactic Ganciclovir, Valganciclovir or placebo. The primary endpoint was reduction in IL-6 which is thought to be an important mediator in CMV reactivation. Secondary endpoint included occurrence of CMV reactivation, effects on the need for mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, incidence of secondary infections and mortality.
The primary analysis did not demonstrate any significant difference in IL-6 levels with Gancioclovir prophylaxis. Ganciclovir prophylaxis however had a statistically significant effect of the incidence of CMV reactivation with a rate of 39% in the placebo group and 12% in the treatment arm; p=< 0.001. In the overall group there was not a significant difference in mortality or secondary infections. The ganciclovir arm had 3 additional ventilator-free days; a finding that reached the border of statistical significance.

The data from this trial would indicate that Ganciclovir prophylaxis should not at this time be given as prophylaxis to all sepsis patients or even the subpopulation of sepsis patients who are CMV prophylaxis. A clinical trial that still should be performed is RCT of "pre-emptive" Ganciclovir in sepsis patients who demonstrate CMV reactivation as indicated by a positive PCR data. The literature would indicate that this would occur in approximately 30% of the 60% of patients who are seropositive for CMV or 18% of the total population with sepsis. This is not an insignificant number of patients. A meta-analysis by Andre Kalil and colleagues (Crit Care Med 2009 Aug; 37(8):2350-8.) revealed an all-cause mortality of 39% in patients with CMV viremia versus those without 27%. A clinical trial of approximately 500 patients would likely be needed to answer this critical question.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"I'm Throwing you (ID) Pearls Here" by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.

Prior to me employed by a non-academic teaching hospital I spent 11 years teaching Infectious Disease to medical students, Internal Medicine residents and ID fellows at 3 different academic teaching hospitals. I had a vast array of clinical pearls that I would share on teaching rounds. In my last 5 years in a non-teaching setting I am often amazed that no one ever taught physicians who are Board Certified in Internal Medicine these important teaching points. I thought it might be useful to share some of my favorite ID teaching points or "pearls" in this blog. 1) oral Beta lactam agents are not adequate treatment of bacteremia 2) Beta-lactam- beta lactamase drugs (Unasyn, Zosyn) and Carbapenems (Ertapenem and Meropenem) have perfectly adequate anaerobic coverage and do not require the addition of Metronidazole 3) Oral vancomycin has no bioavailability 4) Vancomycin is inferior to Beta lactam drugs for the treatment of serious MSSA infections 5) When awaiting sensiti

"The Viral Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease: Time to put it to the test!" by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was estimated to affect 35.5 million people worldwide in 2010 and is expected to affect 115.4 million people by 2050. Approximately 10% of people over 65 are affected and 50% of population > 85 are affected. The currently approved drugs provide minimal benefit. The benefit of experimental drugs observed in Phase II clinical trials has been followed by resounding failures in adequately powered Phase III clinical trials. Even the results of the highly publicized Biogen study have significant questions associated with it. It is quite clear that a new strategy must be entertained and tested. Four members of the Human Herpes Virus family have been associated with development of Alzheimer’s disease; HSV-1, VZV, HHV-6A, and HHV-7. HSV-1 is capable in vitro leading to the production the Beta amyloid protein found in senile plaques and phosphorylating tau protein seen in neurofibrillary tangles seen in Alzheimer’s, a   phenomenon that can be blocked by co-incub

"Testing Strategies Against Lyme Persisters" by Steven LaRosa, MD

Recently I was contacted and interviewed by a party to get my feelings about the state of treatment of Lyme disease. On the phone we lamented about the sizable number of poor souls who continue to suffer symptoms after what is considered standard of care treatment. I made it clear to the interviewer that I practice only evidence-based medicine and that I treat patients based upon the IDSA guidelines. I also railed against physicians who treat patients with months of parenteral antibiotic therapy for “Chronic Limes’ Disease” (ha ha). I stated fairly aggressive and believe that such practices opens the patient to life threatening infections including catheter-related bacteremia and Clostridium difficile colitis. After I got off the phone I started to do some soul searching. I have gotten so used to saying the same lines over and over again, but when was the last time that I actually had looked at the literature? The answer obviously was way too long ago. I was able to identify 5 cli