Skip to main content

"Getting Serious About Vancomycin Selection and Dosing" by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.

Introduction
As an Infectious Disease physician and Antimicrobial Stewardship Director I encounter a large number of patients who have been empirically started on Vancomycin due to a concern for MRSA infections or Gram positive infection with a reported penicillin allergy. I often see patients being given 1gm IV q 12hours without any attention to seriousness of illness, body weight, kidney function or susceptibility of the infecting organism. This blog will address how to optimize the use and dosing of Vancomycin.


Is Vancomycin even necessary?
Vancomycin is quite often given as part of empiric therapy for pneumonia and skin and soft tissue infections without much thought as to if it is necessary. A good starting point in the evaluation of the need for Vancomycin is to a "chart biopsy" on the patient. In the evaluation of the EMR I look for past cultures or MRSA screen results. This exercise may reveal that the patient has had in fact MSSA and not MRSA colonization/infections (see next section). In pneumonia, data now exists that Vancomycin can safely be discontinued if a patient is not colonized with MRSA. In a patient with pneumonia I will typically order MRSA screens of both the nares and pharynx. If both of these results are negative I will stop Vancomycin unless there is a sputum or BAL that grows MRSA. In skin and soft tissue infections, IDSA guidelines do not recommend the empiric use of Vancomycin in non-purulent cellulitis. For purulent infections I use microbiology results to guide further use of vancomycin. An MRSA screen of the groin will also yield evidence of MRSA colonization is cases where the nares MRSA screen is negative.

MSSA infections and "Penicillin allergies"

Vancomycin is often given as a substitute for Cefazolin and Oxacillin in patients with reported penicillin allergies. The literature however is quite clear that for serious Methicillin sensitive Staph aureus (MSSA) infections that Vancomycin is inferior in efficacy to Beta -lactams. Additionally, of the 10% of patients who have a stated penicillin allergy only 10% of those or 1% overall will have a true penicillin allergy. Data from the University of Washington has shown a very rare incidence of allergic reactions to Cefazolin even in patients with listed penicillin allergies. In MSSA infections we should really be following their advice that Cefazolin can be given unless the patient has a history of anaphylaxis or Steven-Johnson syndrome from penicillin.

Loading Dose
It is quite common for patients to be initiated on a standing every 12 hour dose of vancomycin without a loading dose even in serious infections. The absence of a loading dose can lead to a 3 day delay in achieving adequate drug exposure. A loading dose of 25mg/kg actual body weight can significantly shorten the time to adequate drug exposures. Concerns for nephrotoxicity with high loading doses of Vancomycin (up to 3 gms) have not been found in clinical studies.

Vancomycin Dosing and Exposure

The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend that in serious MRSA infections one should target a Vancomycin trough of 15-20. In a review of the literature there is very little data to support vancomycin troughs as a biomarker for drug efficacy. Vancomycin 's efficacy is determined by drug exposure over time. It is both concentration dependent and time dependent. In animal studies and human studies efficacy is best seen with a Vancomycin AUC to MIC ratio that exceeds 400. A very poor correlation exists between Vancomycin troughs and AUC: MIC ratio. In fact in many patients with MRSA infection (MIC < or =1) an AUC: MIC ratio> 400 can be achieved with a Vancomycin trough < 15. What we then see is patients being exposed to excessively high Vancomycin levels in an effort to chase a Vancomycin trough of 15-20. This practice only results in unwanted nephrotoxicity.

So how does a busy clinician practically target an AUC: MIC ratio of 400? The denominator MRSA MIC can be ascertained from the microbiology report or can be assumed to be 1 for empiric therapy provided your institution does not have a large number of MRSA isolates with MICs > 1. A quick and dirty way to estimate the required daily dose to achieve an AUC: MIC ratio is to multiply 400 X estimated Vancomycin clearance. Estimated Vancomycin clearance is calculated as follows: Creatinine clearance X 0.79 + 15.4 X 0.06. Estimated doses can also be calculated using many available apps.  I use the Vancomycin Calculator by Sean Kane, PharmD on my Iphone. The only data I need to load to get my initial dosing guidance are age, gender, height, weight and serum creatinine. In terms of checking to see that the exposure is adequate on a given regimen it is best to get 2 Vancomycin levels during a dosing interval. I typically will obtain a Vancomycin peak 1 hour after the third dose and a Vancomycin trough thirty minutes before the fourth dose. These values are then entered into the calculator to yield information as to if the dose and infusion duration needs to be altered to achieve a Vancomycin AUC: MIC ratio > 400.

Vancomycin MICs >1
The discussion above implies the significance of the MRSA MIC to Vancomycin dosing. One can easily see that despite having a "sensitive" MRSA isolate with a Vancomycin of 2 that you would have to double the daily dose of vancomycin to achieve an AUC: MIC of > 400. For a healthy person with normal or augmented renal function this could entail daily doses far in excess of 4 gms/ day. The incidence of Vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity rises precipitously as you go to > 3-4 grams per day. Additionally clinical studies have demonstrated increased mortality when with Vancomycin when the MIC is > 1. For this reason I immediately go to an alternative agent such as Daptomycin if the patient has had a previous or current MRSA isolate with a Vancomycin MIC > 1.

Concluding Remarks
As can be gleaned from above, the choice of vancomycin and appropriate dosing is quite complicated business. I have become of the mind that Vancomycin use and dosing should become subject to a 100% prospective Antimicrobial Stewardship audit. Many hospitals have already gone to a pharmacy directed Vancomycin dosing service. I would envision also looking at past records, colonization status, allergy review, indication and microbiology data in addition to dosing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"I'm Throwing you (ID) Pearls Here" by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.

Prior to me employed by a non-academic teaching hospital I spent 11 years teaching Infectious Disease to medical students, Internal Medicine residents and ID fellows at 3 different academic teaching hospitals. I had a vast array of clinical pearls that I would share on teaching rounds. In my last 5 years in a non-teaching setting I am often amazed that no one ever taught physicians who are Board Certified in Internal Medicine these important teaching points. I thought it might be useful to share some of my favorite ID teaching points or "pearls" in this blog. 1) oral Beta lactam agents are not adequate treatment of bacteremia 2) Beta-lactam- beta lactamase drugs (Unasyn, Zosyn) and Carbapenems (Ertapenem and Meropenem) have perfectly adequate anaerobic coverage and do not require the addition of Metronidazole 3) Oral vancomycin has no bioavailability 4) Vancomycin is inferior to Beta lactam drugs for the treatment of serious MSSA infections 5) When awaiting sensiti

"The Viral Hypothesis of Alzheimer's Disease: Time to put it to the test!" by Steven P. LaRosa, M.D.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was estimated to affect 35.5 million people worldwide in 2010 and is expected to affect 115.4 million people by 2050. Approximately 10% of people over 65 are affected and 50% of population > 85 are affected. The currently approved drugs provide minimal benefit. The benefit of experimental drugs observed in Phase II clinical trials has been followed by resounding failures in adequately powered Phase III clinical trials. Even the results of the highly publicized Biogen study have significant questions associated with it. It is quite clear that a new strategy must be entertained and tested. Four members of the Human Herpes Virus family have been associated with development of Alzheimer’s disease; HSV-1, VZV, HHV-6A, and HHV-7. HSV-1 is capable in vitro leading to the production the Beta amyloid protein found in senile plaques and phosphorylating tau protein seen in neurofibrillary tangles seen in Alzheimer’s, a   phenomenon that can be blocked by co-incub

"Testing Strategies Against Lyme Persisters" by Steven LaRosa, MD

Recently I was contacted and interviewed by a party to get my feelings about the state of treatment of Lyme disease. On the phone we lamented about the sizable number of poor souls who continue to suffer symptoms after what is considered standard of care treatment. I made it clear to the interviewer that I practice only evidence-based medicine and that I treat patients based upon the IDSA guidelines. I also railed against physicians who treat patients with months of parenteral antibiotic therapy for “Chronic Limes’ Disease” (ha ha). I stated fairly aggressive and believe that such practices opens the patient to life threatening infections including catheter-related bacteremia and Clostridium difficile colitis. After I got off the phone I started to do some soul searching. I have gotten so used to saying the same lines over and over again, but when was the last time that I actually had looked at the literature? The answer obviously was way too long ago. I was able to identify 5 cli